Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reinventing education while making discovering more available but likewise stimulating arguments on its impact.

While students hail AI tools like ChatGPT for enhancing their knowing experience, speakers are raising issues about the growing reliance on AI, which they argue fosters laziness and undermines academic integrity, especially with many trainees unable to defend their projects or offered works.

Prof. Isaac Nwaogwugwu, a lecturer at the University of Lagos, in an interview with Nairametrics, revealed frustration over the growing reliance on AI-generated responses among trainees recounting a current experience he had.

RelatedStories

Avoid sharing individual information that can determine you with AI tools- Expert cautions

Chinese AI app DeepSeek worldwide tech selloff, challenges U.S. AI dominance

"I provided a project to my MBA students, and out of over 100 students, about 40% submitted the exact very same answers. These students did not even know each other, however they all utilized the exact same AI tool to produce their reactions," he said.

He noted that this trend is widespread amongst both undergraduate and postgraduate students but is particularly worrying in part-time and range learning programs.

"AI is a severe difficulty when it pertains to tasks. Many trainees no longer think critically-they simply go online, produce answers, and submit," he included.

Surprisingly, some lecturers are also implicated of over-relying on AI, setting a cycle where both educators and students turn to AI for convenience rather than intellectual rigor.

This argument raises critical concerns about the role of AI in scholastic integrity and student development.

According to a UNESCO report, while ChatGPT reached 100 million month-to-month active users in January 2023, just one country had released policies on generative AI as of July 2023.

Since December 2024, ChatGPT had over 300 million individuals using the AI chatbot every week and 1 billion messages sent out every day around the globe.

Decline of academic rigor

University speakers are significantly worried about students submitting AI-generated projects without truly comprehending the content.

Dr. Felix Echekoba, a lecturer at Nnamdi Azikiwe University, revealed his issues to Nairametrics about trainees progressively depending on ChatGPT, only to battle with responding to basic questions when checked.

"Many students copy from ChatGPT and submit polished tasks, but when asked fundamental concerns, they go blank. It's disappointing due to the fact that education is about finding out, not just passing courses," he stated.

- Prof. Nwaogwugwu mentioned that the increasing variety of top-notch graduates can not be totally associated to AI but confessed that even high-performing trainees use these tools.
"A first-rate trainee is a first-rate trainee, AI or not, but that does not suggest they don't cheat. The benefits of AI may be peripheral, however it is making trainees dependent and less analytical," he said.

- Another lecturer, Dr. Ereke, from Ebonyi State University, raised a different concern that some speakers themselves are guilty of the same practice.
"It's not just trainees using AI slackly. Some lecturers, out of their own laziness, produce lesson notes, course details, marking schemes, and even exam concerns with AI without examining them. Students in turn use AI to produce answers. It's a cycle of laziness and it is killing real knowing," he regreted.

Students' perspectives on usage

Students, on the other hand, say AI has actually improved their knowing experience by making scholastic materials more reasonable and accessible.

- Eniola Arowosafe, a 300-level Business Administration student at Unilag, shared how AI has actually significantly helped her learning by breaking down complex terms and providing summaries of prolonged texts.
"AI helped me understand things more easily, especially when handling complicated subjects," she explained.

However, she recalled an instance when she utilized AI to send her job, just for her speaker to instantly acknowledge that it was generated by ChatGPT and decline it. Eniola noted that it was a good-bad result.

- Bryan Okwuba, fakenews.win who just recently graduated with a first-rate degree in Pharmacy Technology from the University of Lagos, firmly believes that his academic success wasn't due to any AI tool. He attributes his exceptional grades to actively interesting by asking questions and concentrating on locations that speakers stress in class, as they are typically shown in exam concerns.
"It's all about being present, paying attention, and tapping into the wealth of understanding shared by my associates," he said,

- Tunde Awoshita, a final-year marketing trainee at UNIZIK, confesses to sometimes copying directly from ChatGPT when facing numerous due dates.
"To be sincere, there are times I copy straight from ChatGPT when I have several deadlines, and I know I'm guilty of that, most times the lecturers do not get to check out through them, but AI has actually likewise assisted me find out faster."

Balancing AI's role in education

Experts think the option depends on AI literacy; mentor students and lecturers how to utilize AI as a knowing help rather than a faster way.

- Minister of Education, Dr. Tunji Alausa, highlighted the combination of AI into Nigeria's education system, sitiosecuador.com worrying the importance of a balanced technique that keeps human involvement while harnessing AI to improve finding out outcomes.
"As we browse the rapidly evolving landscape of Expert system (AI), it is essential that we prioritise human firm in education. We should guarantee that AI enhances, rather than replaces, teachers' vital function in shaping young minds," he said

Concerns over AI in Learning

Dorcas Akintade, a cybersecurity change expert, resolved growing concerns regarding making use of expert system (AI) tools such as ChatGPT and their prospective threats to the academic system.

- She acknowledged the advantages of AI, nevertheless, stressed the need for care in its use.
- Akintade highlighted the increasing hesitance among teachers and schools toward incorporating AI tools in discovering environments. She determined two main reasons AI tools are discouraged in academic settings: security threats and plagiarism. She described that AI tools like ChatGPT are trained to respond based upon user interactions, which may not align with the expectations of educators.
"It is not taking a look at it as a tutor," Akintade said, explaining that AI doesn't deal with particular mentor techniques.

Plagiarism is another concern, as AI pulls from existing data, often without proper attribution

"A lot of individuals need to understand, like I said, this is data that has actually been trained on. It is not simply bringing things out from the sky. It's bringing information that some other people are fed into it, which in essence means that is another person's documentation," she warned.

- Additionally, Akintade highlighted an early problem in AI development understood as "hallucination," where AI tools would create info that was not accurate.
"Hallucination implied that it was bringing out details from the air. If ChatGPT might not get that info from you, it was going to make one up," she explained.

She recommended "grounding" AI by providing it with particular details to avoid such errors.

Navigating AI in Education

Akintade argued that banning AI tools outright is not the service, especially when AI presents a chance to leapfrog standard educational approaches.

- She believes that regularly strengthening key info helps individuals keep in mind and avoid making errors when confronted with obstacles.
"Immersion brings conversion. When you inform people the same thing over and over again, when they will make the errors, then they'll keep in mind."

She also empasized the requirement for clear policies and treatments within schools, keeping in mind that numerous schools need to attend to the people and procedure elements of this usage.

- Prof. Nwaogwugwu has resorted to in-class projects and tests to counter AI-driven scholastic dishonesty.
"Now, I primarily utilize projects to ensure trainees supply initial work." However, he acknowledged that handling large classes makes this method difficult.

"If you set intricate concerns, students won't be able to use AI to get direct responses," he explained.

He highlighted the need for forum.altaycoins.com universities to train speakers on crafting exam concerns that AI can not quickly fix while acknowledging that some speakers battle to counter AI abuse due to an absence of technological awareness. "Some speakers are analogue," he said.

- Nigeria released a draft National AI Strategy in August 2024, focusing on ethical AI advancement with fairness, openness, responsibility, and personal privacy at its core.
- UNESCO in a report calls for the policy of AI in education, recommending organizations to audit algorithms, information, and outputs of generative AI tools to ensure they meet ethical requirements, protect user data, and filter inappropriate material.
- It stresses the need to assess the long-lasting impact of AI on critical skills like believing and creativity while developing policies that line up with ethical structures. Additionally, UNESCO suggests implementing age constraints for GenAI use to protect younger students and secure susceptible groups.
- For wiki.lafabriquedelalogistique.fr governments, it encouraged adopting a collaborated nationwide approach to regulating GenAI, including developing oversight bodies and lining up policies with existing information defense and privacy laws. It stresses examining AI risks, menwiki.men imposing more stringent guidelines for classifieds.ocala-news.com high-risk applications, and making sure nationwide data ownership.