For Christmas I got a fascinating gift from a pal - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a few simple triggers about me supplied by my good friend Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and extremely amusing in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of composing, however it's likewise a bit repeated, and extremely verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's prompts in looking at data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repeated hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, because rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can buy any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone producing one in any person's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, created by AI, and developed "exclusively to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, however Mr Mashiach worries that the item is intended as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He hopes to widen his variety, generating various genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps using an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted type of customer AI - selling AI-generated items to human customers.

It's also a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable content based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we in fact suggest human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think using generative AI for innovative purposes must be prohibited, however I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without approval should be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely powerful however let's develop it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have selected to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to use developers' material on the internet to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise strongly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of happiness," says the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening one of its best carrying out markets on the vague pledge of development."

A government representative stated: "No relocation will be made up until we are definitely positive we have a useful strategy that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to help them certify their material, access to premium product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI plan, a nationwide data library including public information from a vast array of sources will also be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the security of AI with, amongst other things, firms in the sector required to share information of the functions of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to want the AI sector to face less guideline.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits versus AI firms, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their approval, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can make up reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector users.atw.hu is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training information and whether it need to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It became the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it its technology for a fraction of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, online-learning-initiative.org and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the minute, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for bigger jobs. It has plenty of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite challenging to read in parts since it's so long-winded.

But provided how quickly the tech is progressing, I'm uncertain the length of time I can remain confident that my considerably slower human writing and editing skills, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in worldwide innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.